If a computer RPG can easily be translated to a TTRPG without changing its nature, then it is indeed a RPG. Conversely, if it has to be altered in a way than its game mechanics became completely different, then it is a fake RPG.
Disagree.
I believe people are way too focused on the idea that a computer RPG
has to be a mirror of tabletop RPGs, just because that's what they started as.
Which is why I stick to the idea that cRPGs (true mirrors), RPGs (e.g. Final Fantasy, Dragon Quest), Action RPGs (Dark Souls, Ys, Secret of Mana), are all RPGs. Could you still beat Dark Souls without engaging in its RPG elements? Probably, but it requires a very skilled person. It would be as valid as saying you can beat other cRPGs relying on lucky rolls all the time.