Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Vapourware Sui Generis + Exanima Early Access

Technomancer

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 24, 2018
Messages
1,489
People don't hate that aspect. They hate that in terms of priorities, it seems like things such as this should be placed lower on the list than actual gameplay.

What makes you think they are not placed lower already? That's the point. Madoc first talked about alchemy years ago when exanima first started. Back then they even hired a chemist consultant from the community to help them think it through. And we didn't see anything since. Clearly because he realized it would just take too long to design as invisioned. Same thing happened with dyes. Was supposed to be out with arena update but it couldn't come out in time so it was delayed until better times. There are countless of examples like that of various teasers (tabards above, dismemberment, cartography, rotted zombies, sight that respects darkness for NPCs), of stuff that is not in game and won't be until devs will finish story and have time for bits and pieces.

Check out this list.

https://www.baremettle.com/forums/index.php?threads/exanima-planned-feature-list.16373/

Most don't follow the dev progress closely to know all that so perception gets skewed. As if devs did fuck all, spending their time on anything BUT the game. Which is simply not true. Levels come out, story gets updated. But most of the features listed there remain undone. Precisely because there is more important stuff to develop.
 
Last edited:

Jinn

Arcane
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
5,039
Out in early access for 9 years, dude. I don't give a shit. Can you get to the end of the dungeon and beat the game? Are all the gameplay mechanics implemented? I don't need to reference a dev list and appreciate what they've decided to put aside. 9 years and you still can't beat what is supposed to be a medium sized dungeon crawl.

9. Years.
 

thesecret1

Arcane
Joined
Jun 30, 2019
Messages
5,854
9 years, dude. I don't give a shit. Can you get to the end of the dungeon and beat the game? Are all the gameplay mechanics implemented? I don't need to reference a dev list and appreciate what they've decided to put aside. 9 years and you still can't beat what is supposed to be a medium sized dungeon crawl.

9. Years.
But imagine that you completed the game for a moment. Would such a victory really feel complete and satisfying without your character wearing armor dyed in double-premium Tyrian purple?

Jokes aside, I actually like little details like dye autism and similar, but to put it anywhere but the utter and complete bottom of the priority list (as in "The game is fully released and this is minor update 1.7.36 where you can dye your clothes a different color!") is just crazy.
 

Jinn

Arcane
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
5,039
It's fine that you don't care how long it's going to take. Just don't act like it's unreasonable or crazy for a lot of us (especially those of us who paid for the game in 2015) to be perplexed or annoyed at how things have and continue to go.
 

Technomancer

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 24, 2018
Messages
1,489
Just don't act like it's unreasonable or crazy for a lot of us (especially those of us who paid for the game in 2015) to be perplexed or annoyed at how things have and continue to go.

Bad game remains bad forever as they say. I act as if it was not unreasonable for some games to take this long to develop. Exanima is certainly not unique in that aspect.
 
Last edited:

AndrewCC

Educated
Joined
Oct 25, 2018
Messages
87
Location
RO
Has anyone ever enjoyed a game less because its plant physics simulation wasn’t accurate enough? I respect the man’s commitment to his vision, but get a fucking grip. It’s a game, in the end, all it needs to be is fun.
First of all, it needs to come out.
 

Kruyurk

Learned
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Messages
352
I made my peace with the development pace and the "side" features. Maybe the devs would not stay motivated if they took the shortest path towards a complete Exanima, since their ultimate vision is much more than a dungeon crawler.

My only hope is that they get an increase in sales when Exanima goes out of early access, so that they can scale up their production (either allowing part-time devs to work full-time or new hires). I think Exanima has good chances to get a lot of word-of-mouth when it is complete, just because of how unusual and good it is. It also makes good material for clickbaity videos or articles that could reach outside of the current niche. Of course the game won't sell like a Bethesda title, but some of the best and most innovative "autistic" games do reach a relatively big audience (e.g. Factorio, Kenshi, RimWorld, Dwarf Fortress).
 

Jinn

Arcane
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
5,039
Again, my point is being missed here. The reasonable solution here was for the developers to focus their efforts entirely on finishing the level design, encounter design, item placement, and implementing any magic they wanted to be in the final version, even roughly. Once they had a game that a player could finish, then they could go crazy with the autistic minutiae and bring the tech demo to grand fruition over the next decade, or two, or three. The game wouldn't have to leave early access, none of this other stuff would be rushed, but the game would at least be completable for those who want to do so. Technomancer, you act like the game even in its current state is god's gift to man, so how could it be a bad game if the fairly simple expectation above was fulfilled? It wouldn't be a bad game forever. It'd just be a good "unfinished" game that could actually be played through to the end while we wait for the rest of the divine masterpiece to be painstakingly brought into existence someday.

Every time I decide to engage in this thread again every year or so, I feel like I lose another sanity point. It seriously feels like a fever dream or something.
 

agris

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Apr 16, 2004
Messages
6,867
Predictable joke is predictable. And even pointing out it was mostly a thing of the past by the time Renaissance came over, didn't shield me from your inexhaustible wit @agris
unfortunately for everyone wishing to play a completed version of this, the largest joke of all is the perpetual procrastination manifested by the developer in the form of micro-simulation autism :/

perfectionists often do not like finishing something, because then it can be judged as a whole. until then, it is all a work-in-progress and subject to change. that's psychological cover for the perfectionist who fears they cannot execute their vision up to their own standard and is worried about the end result.


Bad game remains bad forever as they say. I act as if it was not unreasonable for some games to take this long to develop. Exanima is certainly not unique in that aspect.

while the first sentence is true, an incomplete game is never a complete game - is it? and while the reasonable-ness of development time is obviously subjective, those that financially back the game have the greatest claim to be the judge of that. i understand this is the result of a KS, how satisfied are backers? i see a pretty even split in this thread between discontent and good-for-what-it-is mentality

taken together, I can't help but feel it is a shame what has happened to this game. i hope it's released one day, but whether it's: procedural velvet, historically accurate dye simulation, or corrosion simulation of procedurally generated items; one can't help but feel like for the majority of this game's development history, focus has been everywhere but where it is needed most: in finishing the story, levels, quests and content.
 
Last edited:

Technomancer

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 24, 2018
Messages
1,489
an incomplete game is never a complete game - is it?

Only when company is shut down and no other work is possible. If progress is made, then it is not 'never' is it. Same as with bad game that was released as is and dropped for good, the aspect of finality is important in this context. Its only fair to claim never if they fail to deliver and close the doors. Instead, we are two levels away, version 0.9, hello? I get the frustration over waiting but I don't get the doom and gloom overall. The content updates were never disappointing for those who cared to play them instead of complaining.

the largest joke of all is the perpetual procrastination manifested by the developer in the form of micro-simulation autism.
taken together, I can't help but feel it is a shame what has happened to this game. i hope it's released one day, but whether it's: procedural velvet, historically accurate dye simulation, or corrosion simulation of procedurally generated items;

I feel like this is massively overblown. The velvet you invoke as if it was some major hurdle on progress took a few weeks at worst. It is just the most tricky material, which gave it some unnecessary spotlight. Materials update was a distraction needed because there was a renderer update forced by technical limitations (because of some obsolete elements it was impossible to continue development without overcoming these issues since they would need to be solved later anyway at greater cost). And with renderer update done, materials and assets needed mandatory remaster too because those that were made ten years ago looked like complete ass and created sharp ugly contrast. This was the biggest hiatus on recent memory and it happened two years ago.

There is no dye simulation. It is just item coloring system with some vaguely historic elements (massively simplified compared to the real thing because the main intent for it is flavor and immersion, not complexity for the sake of it) to liven up the grind of arena and offer more customization options. And I don't see how it is relevant, I repeated several times it is not actively developed because arena is secondary to story and so it is postponed. But you continue to insinuate it is an active issue, as if devs were working on it in secret instead of toiling on story content, despite hearing about it for the first time a few days ago.

There is no corrosion sim, you just imagine all of these complex systems in your jests then start thinking them as real. There will be no real time item degradation under rain or whatever. You won't need to fix crap every five minutes like in oblivion. You simply find items in various procedural conditions. There is no complex sim involved, its just set up procgen modifiers and a bit of rng.

one can't help but feel like for the majority of this game's development history, focus has been everywhere but where it is needed most: in finishing the story, levels, quests and content.

That's true. A lot of time was spent on tech, especially in the beginning when all they had was basically a rough and janky prototype. At the time, focus on it was to be expected since the game was intended to be Sui Generis' technology and assets fundament. But I think the last update, which was the biggest content expansion to date, clearly showed their current direction.
 
Last edited:

Technomancer

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 24, 2018
Messages
1,489
The reasonable solution here was for the developers to focus their efforts entirely on finishing the level design, encounter design, item placement

What makes you think none of this is done? With most of the levels already in game, level design is likewise mostly finished. For upcoming levels too, devs are busy with constructing them as we speak for the future update. And recently they finished updating last old levels that remained (catacombs and foundry) with a mini update coming out soon for closed testing and release. Encounter design is present on every level. Most of the enemies in the game are roaming but there are certain situations that are preset since characters are locked by circumstances to areas. The only thing that can be considered unfinished here is idea madoc had for various randomized "events" you could stumble on in the dungeon. Item placement is as well complete. There are several quest items that do not do anything because they require content from the levels that are not in game yet but absolute majority of items have function, purpose and place. There are keys to find, secrets to discover and lore to puzzle together. When it comes to gear items, they are fully procedural, there are hidden arcane tools that modify items you find and there are unique weapons and armors that have special attributes. The only unimplemented idea when it comes to itemization is randomized chest placement on levels.

implementing any magic they wanted to be in the final version, even roughly

And magic as well is 90% done, its way beyond rough version. And this is my point, those who wait for the game but do not play it, often assume a lot without really knowing anything. Current magic has two fully implemented magic trees (misses one or two spells), lacks code for mass casting and power scaling system. That's it. 4 other schools of magic were never intended to appear in Exanima before SG.


@Technomancer, you act like the game even in its current state is god's gift to man

Nah, its just a game. I like it a lot, and its innovative in many aspects but I barely play it these days. Only so much you can do in a dungeon crawler, you know? I memorized most of the levels at this point and I gave up on arena once rare unavoidable save wipe destroyed all of my progress. Now SG, if that will ever come out and it will succeed on implementing their grand ideas, yeah, I think I could call it that.
 
Last edited:

Technomancer

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 24, 2018
Messages
1,489
Waiting for hug and kiss physics

Already in, git gud scrub :cool:

rkkvt2wu4ew61.gif
 

Spike

Educated
Joined
Apr 6, 2023
Messages
637

Technomancer

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 24, 2018
Messages
1,489
March 2024

This has been a month of mostly wrapping things up and getting them ready for a release. There have been a lot of important core improvements that affect the entire game and content, so we want to get the game in testing and updated before moving on to other things. This includes the switch to 64 bit and optimizations to many parts of the engine, the overhauled terrain system and all related assets, improvements our physics engine and important new features, a complete graphical overhaul of the golem area, a huge rework and expansion of the Catacombs map and a few other smaller, but still important improvements. It's a lot.

Most recently we've been working on improvements and additions to our physics engine. These are things we've been wanting to do for some time and are extremely important for the future of the game. The core physics improvements are immediately obvious in gameplay, they make weapon interactions feel and function better in combat, they solve many problems and we're already noticing how they allow us to do more with level design and interaction. Last month we released a video where we showed what was basically a prototype version of new cloth and soft body features. This is something we hope to use extensively for things like clothing, plants, those creepy fleshy growths, sheets of paper and generally the many things that should be soft, flexible, floppy and squishy. This would allow a new level of immersion and interactivity. Dynamic physical interactions are at the core of Exanima's gameplay and immersive world, and this is something we want to extend to every part of it.

The key breakthrough we demonstrated in our video was a performant way to do polygonal collision on deformable bodies. While it's great that we're able to do realistic interactions between cloth and things like weapons, this provides a versatile solution for all sorts of soft bodies beyond cloth, where simpler methods could be considered sufficient. Since the video we've further improved our model, stress testing it and making it very functional and stable under many conditions and applications. We can drape cloth over objects, hold objects in nets and sacks and do all sort of tricky things that require a very stable and accurate model.

Performance is of course a major concern, we identified good, fast methods, but we still had to optimise what we showed then. We knew our prototype implementation could be made roughly 10 times faster, and we joked about making it 20 times faster, but that's what we did. Then we optimised it even more, and made it 40 times faster. This being physics, it means a bigger performance budget for more cool things. Another important optimisation was making deformable bodies that aren't currently doing much and actively interacting with anything, or visible, or casting a visible shadow etc., go into an idle state where they cost virtually nothing. This is ultimately what allows us to have a huge number of these complex objects in an environment.

In keeping with Exanima's full interactivity, we also added the ability to move and drag cloth around with the cursor. Besides that consistent immersive feel, this has a number of gameplay implications that we're eager to explore. Another of Exanima's more unique features is perfect persistence of everything, this means that if you leave a piece of cloth draped over something in a particular way and exited your game, it has to be in the same exact position when you return to it.

We've also extended our development tools to support these new features and generally improve our workflow for all physics. We've been constantly making improvements to our tools and also making them more intuitive and user friendly, for eventual modding use and also if and when we expand our team.

There is so much we can do with these new features and we're very excited by the possibilities, but as usual much will be revealed when we add new content and gameplay where you can experience it fully first hand. Everything we listed up top and these core improvements are in the polishing stage now and we hope to begin testing in the next few days and get it all released for everyone soon after.

Best,

Bare Mettle
 
Joined
May 31, 2018
Messages
2,571
Location
The Present
Awesome. Now we can pull wedgies out of our knickers and finally have an accurate purse physics. Lets see if anything useful comes of it. Being able to literally pull a rug out from under an opponent, or snare them with a table cloth like an improvised net would be hilarious.
 

Cohesion

Liturgist
Patron
Joined
May 14, 2015
Messages
664
Location
Moscow, Russia
Codex+ Now Streaming!
Release in 2060? I won't make it probably. Maybe my grandsons would enjoy this game and Scam Citizen.

:despair:
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom