Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Wizardry Did D.W. Bradley ruin the Wizardry series?

Did D.W. Bradley ruin the Wizardry series?

  • No. The previous games were antiquated. Bradley saved Wizardry from mediocrity.

    Votes: 14 43.8%

  • No. Bradley didn't abandon the design of previous games as much as you claim.

    Votes: 8 25.0%

  • Yes. The Japanese Wizardry games are the true successors to the original series.

    Votes: 2 6.3%

  • Blobbers are for fat autists (KC)

    Votes: 8 25.0%
  • Total voters
    32
zapotec

zapotec

Liturgist
Joined
Feb 7, 2018
Messages
1,499
Wizard & Warriors has wonderful dungeons to explore.
 
KeighnMcDeath

KeighnMcDeath

RPG Codex Boomer
Joined
Nov 23, 2016
Messages
13,178
I’ll eventually get it but not yet. I really want to see people let loose with their creations. Any game with a construction mechanic is something I try to follow when I can (not that I don’t like the modders/programmers for games with no construction sets. So many mods, so much to follow).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom