Here's a question: if this is such compelling news that we wanted to believe it even after we knew it was a hoax, then why wouldn't gaming companies do this? I mean, isn't that like leaving money on the table? If there is a need, shouldn't a company's executives think, "hmm, might be money there"?
I guess what I'm asking is, why is a company ignoring a home run opportunity, and instead letting the less compelling concept take a swing? Do these companies dislike money?
I continue to think the same thing about Planescape. PS:T did so-so for its makers, but now it has grown in legend. It seems like a sequel would be like Star Wars -- even if it's average, it's going to make a lot of money. There are just too many fans, too many people in the market with influence who would be advocates for anything Planescape.
Oh well. I'm sure FO 3 will be just um, whatever.
I guess what I'm asking is, why is a company ignoring a home run opportunity, and instead letting the less compelling concept take a swing? Do these companies dislike money?
I continue to think the same thing about Planescape. PS:T did so-so for its makers, but now it has grown in legend. It seems like a sequel would be like Star Wars -- even if it's average, it's going to make a lot of money. There are just too many fans, too many people in the market with influence who would be advocates for anything Planescape.
Oh well. I'm sure FO 3 will be just um, whatever.