Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Decline 90s and early 00s games had so much style, wtf happened

Egosphere

Arcane
Joined
Jan 25, 2018
Messages
1,913
Location
Hibernia
Found it:

cflIBbQ.jpeg


The quote's even funnier than I remember. Todd's a legend.
The xbox version outsold the PC version. Todd was vindicated.
 

caffeine

Novice
Joined
Aug 11, 2023
Messages
63
Todd was already sucking Microsoft dick in 2002
All western devs did. The original XBOX did a number on PC gaming and plunged the platform into a dark age as Microsoft offered a blank check to devs, desperate to have games on its new system. If Valve hadn't come up with Steam, it would have been ogre for PC.
 

gabel

fork's latest account
Patron
Joined
Mar 27, 2023
Messages
1,537
It was not only Microsoft though.
Remember, back then, you still owned your games, and Steam was the villain.
In comes MS, and suddenly, Steam is the saviour? Not much longer and you won't be able to access the internet without your digital id.
We are living in the dystopia all of us critics and "conspiracy theorists" warned about back then.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
171
TLDR in the bottom.
Disclaimer: I agree that the Golden Age 1989-2005 is unsurpassed in terms of hit games per year and innovation. I loved alot of games during that era and played them when they came out and have the game boxes at my dads attic: Morrowind, Shogun: Total War, Warcraft 2-3, Starcraft, Silver, Atlantis, Commandos, Homeworld, Lords of the realm 2, Black & White, Outcast, MoH&CoD, Xwing vs Tie, Diablo 1-2, Settlers 2, Tachyon: the Fringe, Freespace 1-2, Ground Control 1, DoW1, Monkey Island 3, Dungeon Keeper, Hearts of Iron, Hexen 1-2, Heretic 1-2, Quake 1-2, Future Cop LAPD, Half Life 1-2 etc etc. And earlier I played a lot of Amiga 500 and Nintendo 8. Honorable mention to the mod The Specialist for HL1, unsurpassed pvp twitch shooter.

Advancements in recent gaming:
With that said alot of my favorite games has been made after 2005. Advancement in immersion, online play, hardware and innovation made these possible. The RTS genre while not as vast as before has been refined. There are a lot of games that are if not outright innovative but atleast evolutionary and that is incline. Sure the classics are excellent, but these newer games have improvements that wins me over if I'm looking to play something.

RTS & RTT:
Dawn Of War 2: It has a good story with strong classic mission with several objectives, especially Chaos Rising. But it really shines in multiplayer, especially Retribution. I have poured hundred of hours playing these games online. The tech allows good progression in multiplayer and team games becomes epic army battles. Good evolutionary combination of classic rts with rtt and warcraft 3 style heroes that carries over in campaigns. It's focus on RTT makes it a difference game than DoW1, especially campaign (that you can play coop).

Wargame series: Pinnacle of RTT PvP online gaming. Big maps that forces the player to think about road speed, fuel, ammo and time until reinforcements. Good deck system to customize your force. Very complex unit interactions: motorised or mechanized units armour and firepower vs speed, helicopters all from transport and supply to recon and attack helicopters. Anti air, both optical and radar, gun and missile. Sense anti radar missiles ( SEAD ) exists radar aa can become a liability. Tanks, special forces Recon, ATGMs, scouts, jets etc etc. Hundreds of hours on these games.

WARNO: This is still in early access but is becoming a true evolution of the series. Eugen Systems are implementing new mechanics like smart orders and Rules of Engagement(no more dumb robots as soldiers, you can set them to retreat or advance when taking fire), better urban areas including high rises, actively working against cheese by fixing helicopters and improving systems like sight, rebalancing turn speed of tank turret to balance forest engagement vs infantry etc etc, faster ATGMs that can retarget, trait system, reworked fobs, smoke launchers for vehicles, SEAD planes that actually jams radar aa, divisions, can give orders before battle starts. Several QoL improvements combined with actual new mechanics and active development could make this game an instant classic when they finish with it. Nothing this complex in real time had been released before.

Supreme Commander: Sure a spiritual succesor to TA. But again hardware capabilities of the 00s and 10s allowed games to take advantage of these and transform them into gameplay mechanics. The scale and zoom of supcom is truly massive and the interface was reworked so you can flawlessly at a glance get the information you require. Nostalgia or no, SupCom was a technical evolution of the subgenre made possible through harnessing hardware advancement. Just like 3D games of the 90s were made passible through harnessing new hardware. Maybe not an innovation but atleast an evolution.

Online play:
Insurgency mod for HL2: Slow paced tactical pvp with precise character control in small maps where people actually go down when you hit them, one of the best pvp shooters where slow smart movement is rewarded. Nothing like it before.

Project Reality Battlefield 2 mod: V1.0 released 2013. Made BF2 into an actual semi mil pvp shooter that promoted teamplay. Big maps. Sure BF 1942 and Operation Flashpoint was earlier but they respectively did not have the realism or frequent massive pvp games where people cooperated. One of the best games ever released, with Squad making a good effort to catch up now with it's Infantry Combat Overhaul project. Separate gunner driver, mortar, atgm placements, only spawn in main base, fobs or squad rally points. etc etc.

Empires mod for HL2: A multiplayer Battlezone game where your team form in squads and have to secure refineries over big maps. But one player on each team plays as a commander that can place down buildings like barracks and factories, making close teamplay between squads and the command a necessity to win or even play the game. The commander also choses research that affects vehicles that goes from apc, light to heavy tank and mobile artillery. For example electrical gives faster vehicles, physic harder, bio give DOT damage etc etc. Lots of fun stuff, engineers can build walls, gun/missle towers and ammo caches with seismic grenades. Riflemen got assault carbine or MG, scouts with invis. Could develop into fun ww1 battles from time to time but also massive coordinated mechanized assaults. One of the best multiplayer pvp "massive" team game of all time, a truly innovative and experimental game, it even had a "invasion" mode that was purely tactical and fun.

Age of Chivalry mod for HL2: First person pvp mayhem with close combat weapons, nothing like it had came before that was played at that scale, hundreds of hours of fun with 32vs32. It basically created a new genre even if small with Mordhau vs Chivalry 2 are the current ones.

Game mechanics:
Dark Souls 1: Need no introduction, excellent world building and lore. But I don't agree that it is a Ninja Garden style game, maybe Elden Ring and DS3 is but not DS1 and 2. What made DS1 so special for me was that the character was slow. It allowed every weapon to truly show of its unique capability. Fighting with a halberd, spear, two handed sword or a short sword gave complexly different play styles, and the character was not jumping around the whole screen like an anime character like in Ninja Garden. A souls like for me must have weight and momentum to the character and it's weapons with locked in animations, overwise it's just a Devil May Cry game.

Dark Souls 2: Many don't like it as much but for me it's a gem. The unique things about DS2 it that it makes the story personal, not about gods, but the intro cutscenes is about your actual character seeing his friends and family slipping away, losing his mind. The intro with the witches in the dark forest with 5.1 at night almost turns the game into a horror game, excellent suspense and later on the setting is part wise best of the franchise.

Dark Souls 3: Adds fluid mechanics, good vistas, good bosses, better magic & weapon art system and most of all an actual good endgame section, even more so with its DLCs. Good pvp.

Disco Elysium: One of the best rpgs that is actual innovative by giving the attributes voices combined with a faster dialog doing away with the lore dump "conversations" of the infinity engines games. Beautiful setting and you really feel for the character. Good cast and score.

Immersion open world games:
Death Stranding: A game that manages to transform walking from a timesink to an actual engaging experience and did so over beautiful diverse terrain and did so with a gameplay mechanics that support the story and game loop, you really want to build up the roads. Along the asynchronous multiplayer the core gameplay loop was really fun for me, good combination of building and hiking. I spend a lot of time building up a zipline network in the mountain that cut travel time down to nothing once it was complete, pioneer feeling. An innovative game, even if you don't like it.

ELEX: Big beautifully open world with diverse biomes to explore easily with the jetpack. Excellent quest design and characters. I was completely hooked playing this game from start to finish. One of the few games that really made me comeback for more until I finish the whole game, played it with an overhaul mod ofcourse. Devs can never balance for shit no matter the game or company.
Risen 1: Excellent combination of medieval people on Caribbean island, the intro is really immerse with the dark thunderstorm on the beach.

Red Dead 2: It deserves to be mentioned here with how Rockstar through sheer brute force content creation managed to make a game where people can really immerse themself into the world in a way that is physical impossible to produce or run in the nineties. A game that bridges the game between story driver and free form larping with a world that truly feels alive.

Cyberpunk 2077: First time I played I did not like it, but on second play after patch 1.6 I really enjoyed it. The constant first person adds immersion, combined with 4k HDR and Dolby Atmos it really draws you into the world. Strong story and good setting&city. Fun gameplay loop and world building. Now that it has been "fixed" I think it is a really good game with good builds and expanded game mechanics like cyberware. But I will wait a couple of weeks more to play it until the mods catch up.

Systemic games & survival:
Frostpunk: Good game that marry city building with survival mechanics, can't remember playing anything similar during the 90s.

Zelda BotW: A game that truly innovates with game mechanics brining immsims into the future. The way the different physic systems interact with each other in a big open world is unique and genre breaking. Combines with open world traversal of climbing and horse riding, survival with correct cloths

Outward: My favorite game. It combines action rpgs with survival. Good build system with mandatory multi class with a strong meaningful perk system. Good easy to use craft system that uses the same interface for crafting, cooking and alchemy. Big open worlds with diverse faunas like in Outcast. Beautiful vistas and strange faunas like Morrowind, big beautiful score. Survival systems that in an immersive way ties into the gameplay, like for example that dungeons are actually pitch black if you have no light source and it's hard to play if you can't see shit. One of the best magic implementations where you need to sacrifice health and stamina to gain a mana bar. A lot of magic is also ritual requiring casting a magic circle with use of a reagent, which you need your alchemy lab to produce from ingredients found in the wild. Local or online coop.

Misc:
Whole slew of good adventure games: Lacuna, Rainswept, Kathy Rain, Deponia, Gemini Rue, Primordia etc etc.
Fora Horizon 5: The Dolby Atmos mixing in the game might be the best made to this date. The storms, planes, tunnels really are moved to the height channels enveloping you. Excellent HDR as well.
Dirt Rally 2.0: Good rally game, best visual and sound to date. The sense of speed is unparalleled.
EA Sports WRC: Upcoming game from Codemasters releasing at the end of the month and is very promising with good graphic and audio combined with a lot of content.
Carrier Command 2: Pure joy as a coop game.
Indie scene with all old genres. Special mention to Vagrus - Riven Realms.

Closing arguments & TLDR;
I strongly believe that the last 10 years evolution of survival games will, with it's inherently systemic design focus, drive an evolution in games. If anything is going to revive immsims it's going to come from the survival games being incorporated as hybrids. Just as we have seen all fps open world shooters become "action rpgs" we will see "survival rpgs". Now I don't my self play survival and crafting games but have friends who do, and they are immensely popular even if not AAA level yet. Games like 7 days to die, SCUM, Green Hell, Valheim and No man's sky. Especially as old rehashes like Diablo 4, Fac Cry 6 and Starfield keeps failing.

We already see the potential in Outward which will eventually be seen as a game before it's time. Combining survival elements like perishable food and mandatory light sources into an rpg and more importantly immediate feedback on the screen not seen sense Ultima Underworld. Zelda BotW has already implement basic survival into its open world but with a strong physic systemic engine and is immensely popular. Red Dead 2 also by basically making a hunting game mainstream.

And on other fronts we also see an evolution to more advanced games which is inherently incline. Escape from Tarkov is poplar precisely because of it's advanced gun systems implemented into the game. Even Squad and Hell Let Loose developers just recently are moving away from casual arcade shooting striving to implement more advanced systems requiring patience. WARNO is a shining example of an rts adding even more complex system instead of dumbing down. Mordhau was also a game incorporating more systems, not fewer.

So sure we are not in the Golden Age, but things are looking bright, I remain hopeful.
 
Last edited:

BLOBERT

FUCKING SLAYINGN IT BROS
Patron
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
4,252
Location
BRO
Codex 2012
sigh. Not a "new genre". Souls is just an evolution/continuation of old hardcore japanese action games, or "console trash" as you call it. Kings Field, Ninja Gaiden (2004), Castlevania: Lament of Innocence etc.

well, I never played these games, I always thought souslike games felt like 3D metroidvanias. An innovation in my case or an improvement in your case, I'd say.
BRO OF COURSE KINGS FIELD IS LIKE A SOULS ITS MADE BY SAME COMPANY

NINJA GAIDIN IS NOT SOULS LIKE
EITHER IS BAYONETTA DMC WARRIORS ETC

METROIDCANIAS ARE KINDA LIKE A SOULS LIKE

HERE IS WHAT MAKES A SOULS LIKE

1 ACTION GAME PLAY THAT INVOLVES FIGHTING SKILLS NOT POINT ANS CLICK
2 RPG LEVELLING
3 IMPROVING THROUGH NEW ARMOR WEAPONS OR ACCESSORIES AND OR UPGRADING THEM
4 DEATH IS EXPECTED AND RECOVERING LOST XP IS POSSIBLE
5 MAJOR EXPLORATION ELEMENT EVEN GAME WITH SEPERATE LEVELS LIKE NIOH REWARD EXPLORING BY LOOT OR UNLOCKING SHORTCUTS
6 CHECKPOINTS WHERE HEALTH MAGIC AND EXPENDAVLE RESOURCES ARE RESTORED AND YOU CAN LEVEL UP BUT ALSO MAKES ENEMIES RESPAWN

BROS THE SOULS LIKE CATEGORY IS A CATEGORY YOU CAN DEFINE AND YES I AGREE IT SHARES ROOTS IN JAP ACTION GAMES

POINT 4 RECOVERING SOULS AFTER DEATH IS ONE OF THE TELTALE SIGNS OF A SOULS LIKE BECAUSE YOU ARE INTENED TO DIE ANS GET GUD BUT YOU GOT A RISK REWARD SCENRIO FOR EXPLORING THE UNKNOWN
 

BLOBERT

FUCKING SLAYINGN IT BROS
Patron
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
4,252
Location
BRO
Codex 2012
BROS ALSO I REMEMBER MY YOUNG OPTIMISTIC SELF

I LOVED WASTELAND AND ULTIMA FIVE AS A KID

I WAS SURE THAT WHEN I GOT OLDER I WOULD PLAY A PERFECT HYBRID OF THE TWO

WASTELAND DID PROGRESSION ANS SKILL USAGE AWESOME

ULTIMA V WAS THE BEST EVER LIVING WORLD DONE IN A RPG WITH C AND C IN THE STORY

I NEVER GOT MY WISH BROS AND I AM ONLY GLAD THAT FALLOUT AND ARCANUM WERE A MUCH BETTER WASTELAND

MORROWIND WAS I THINK CLOSEST TO ULTIMA V HAVING A REAL WORLD BUT IT WAS NOT NEARLY AS REALISTIC

NOW I AM SAD
 

luj1

You're all shills
Vatnik
Joined
Jan 2, 2016
Messages
13,648
Location
Eastern block

JarlFrank

I like Thief THIS much
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
33,248
Location
KA.DINGIR.RA.KI
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Dawn Of War 2: It has a good story with strong classic mission with several objectives, especially Chaos Rising.
Interesting take.

For me, DoW2 is a massive disappointment because its campaign doesn't feature a single regular RTS mission. Not one where you build up a base and an army to fight off enemies who also build a base and an army. Every mission in the DoW2 campaign plays more like an action RPG with only a handful of units under your control and no basebuilding.

It's the exact opposite of what I want from an RTS campaign.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
171
alot of my favorite games has been made after 2005. Advancement in immersion, online play, hardware and innovation made these possible.
Dawn Of War 2
Disco Elysium
Death Stranding
Cyberpunk 2077

:nocountryforshitposters:

things are looking bright

:nocountryforshitposters:
Sure if you don't like the majority of those games and think they are decline I can understand that. But if you think DoW2 is decline you are just wrong. It's awesome, the whole thing. The production values, the execution, the single player, the multiplayer, the expansions. You sir have no taste.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
171
Dawn Of War 2: It has a good story with strong classic mission with several objectives, especially Chaos Rising.
Interesting take.

For me, DoW2 is a massive disappointment because its campaign doesn't feature a single regular RTS mission. Not one where you build up a base and an army to fight off enemies who also build a base and an army. Every mission in the DoW2 campaign plays more like an action RPG with only a handful of units under your control and no basebuilding.

It's the exact opposite of what I want from an RTS campaign.
Yeah sure I get that. It's not an rts, and as a successor you kind of expect the game to be in the same genre. But it's an RPG/RTT hybrid. Your item and character levels and power carry over from mission to mission. It has a big focus on combined arms so to speak with the four squads you are allowed to bring with you, introducing a deck mini game almost where you pick your specialist for the missions. With that a greater focus on special abilities of the squads and tactical movement.

But i generally enjoy RTT more than RTS so this is mainly why I'm such a big fan of DoW2. The wargame series are also RTT.
 

luj1

You're all shills
Vatnik
Joined
Jan 2, 2016
Messages
13,648
Location
Eastern block
Dawn Of War 2: It has a good story with strong classic mission with several objectives, especially Chaos Rising.
Interesting take.

For me, DoW2 is a massive disappointment because its campaign doesn't feature a single regular RTS mission. Not one where you build up a base and an army to fight off enemies who also build a base and an army. Every mission in the DoW2 campaign plays more like an action RPG with only a handful of units under your control and no basebuilding.

It's the exact opposite of what I want from an RTS campaign.

Other than advances in graphics and production standard, it offered nothing.

Not one true DoW fan liked any of the sequels. DoW 1 cult outlived both of them.

DoW 2 has one use though. As a movie maker for Wh40k fan fiction, thanks to the terrific kill anims.
 

JarlFrank

I like Thief THIS much
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
33,248
Location
KA.DINGIR.RA.KI
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
I played all the original DoW expansions and still go for some Soulstorm campaign occasionally.

But DoW2 was a slog to go through and I don't feel the urge to go back to it at all.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
171
Dawn Of War 2: It has a good story with strong classic mission with several objectives, especially Chaos Rising.
Interesting take.

For me, DoW2 is a massive disappointment because its campaign doesn't feature a single regular RTS mission. Not one where you build up a base and an army to fight off enemies who also build a base and an army. Every mission in the DoW2 campaign plays more like an action RPG with only a handful of units under your control and no basebuilding.

It's the exact opposite of what I want from an RTS campaign.

Other than advances in graphics and production standard, it offered nothing.

Not one true DoW fan liked any of the sequels. DoW 1 cult outlived both of them.

DoW 2 has one use though. As a movie maker for Wh40k fan fiction, thanks to the terrific kill anims.
DoW 2 is still played with the Elite mod.

DoW2 is decline you are just wrong. It's awesome, the whole thing. The production value...

... is all it has.

I played a lot of DoW 1 and still do. It was the last good RTS and actually had some inovations. It is superior in every way, shape or form to its sequels.

You sir have no taste.

Okay Cyberpunk fan
I enjoy DoW 1 alot to, specially winter assault. Loved it. DoW2 is basically another genre than DoW1.
Cyberpunk is cool with mods and a proper home theater system.

I played all the original DoW expansions and still go for some Soulstorm campaign occasionally.

But DoW2 was a slog to go through and I don't feel the urge to go back to it at all.
Have you tried Chaos Rising? It's the best single player. campaign. I can agree the original was a bit of a slog.
 

luj1

You're all shills
Vatnik
Joined
Jan 2, 2016
Messages
13,648
Location
Eastern block
I played all the original DoW expansions and still go for some Soulstorm campaign occasionally.

But DoW2 was a slog to go through and I don't feel the urge to go back to it at all.
Actually I didn't like Soulstorm and stopped at Dark Crusade.

Factions felt like a total mess. Sisters of Battle didn't feel unique or interesting at all. And those aerial units were lel. The whole thing felt rushed.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
171
Have you tried Chaos Rising? It's the best single player. campaign.
Does it feature traditional RTS missions with basebuilding?
No, sure. But it's missions are hand crafted and have good pacing. It feels more in line of those rare missions from classical rts where you were on special assignments and did not have a base but had to complete a set of objectives, these appears in Starcraft 1 and more rts games. Maybe not always as whole missions but atleast as segements.
 

Ravielsk

Magister
Joined
Feb 20, 2021
Messages
1,557
Interesting take.

For me, DoW2 is a massive disappointment because its campaign doesn't feature a single regular RTS mission. Not one where you build up a base and an army to fight off enemies who also build a base and an army. Every mission in the DoW2 campaign plays more like an action RPG with only a handful of units under your control and no basebuilding.

It's the exact opposite of what I want from an RTS campaign.
DoW 2 had no business calling itself Dawn of War. Outside of the general control scheme it had nothing common with DoW 1 or its expansions. All it ultimately did is introduce a schism into the idea of "Dawn of War" because suddenly it was both a RTS and action RPG franchise. I am to this day convinced that DoW 3 was mainly screwed up by this schism as looking at the game makes it obvious the devs tried to cater to both camps and ultimately failed to satisfy either.

The irony is that as player numbers show the DoW2 side of things had no actual longevity to it and was essentially just a case of lightning in a bottle. To this day more people play Soulstorm than all the DoW2 games put together.
RT5tY19.png
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom