Drakortha
Liturgist
HD remaster or not, it's still the only RE worth replaying in 2024 (besides OG PS1 trilogy ofc)
It's funny that I have met countless of young gamers online thinking that HD Remaster version that came out in 2015 was actually a game developed and released in 2015, which shows how good it aged since its actual release.If and when the 2026 Modern Audience remake arrives, words and phrases such as “dated“, “painfully slow”, “inferior” , “so cringe” and “it shucks” will be used to describe the 2002 remake (if they aren't already).
Yep, those pre-rendered backgrounds really help it (and RE Zero) stand the test of time. The character models were very good, too, better than what companies such as Squaresoft and Konami were doing at the time. I never got to play RE Remake when it originally released, but I remember being amazed by all the magazine screenshots and preview videos.It's funny that I have met countless of young gamers online thinking that HD Remaster version that came out in 2015 was actually a game developed and released in 2015, which shows how good it aged since its actual release.If and when the 2026 Modern Audience remake arrives, words and phrases such as “dated“, “painfully slow”, “inferior” , “so cringe” and “it shucks” will be used to describe the 2002 remake (if they aren't already).
At this point, I am genuinely unaware of any official "remaster" effort in gaming that is actually better looking than the original product
I bet some modder could make a version which is "best of the both worlds", the original is a bit too "green-ish" to my taste at least in some areas.
This is peak decline of civilization. Remakes and remasters, remakes and remasters, remakes and remasters, remakes and remasters, remakes and remasters, remakes and remasters...
The way I see it; if someone thinks the controls in the original RE were bad and that the camera perspective wasn't something noteworthy, guess what? They're not a RE fan. It's that simple. At most they are just a RE4 fan who wants every original RE game to be remade into RE4 over and over again because that's the only playstyle they care about.Yes, if you're a fan of the new games we've been eating good..
It's not good enough. It's boring to look at and it's boring to play. Why? because it still looks and plays like RE4 and almost every other 3rd person shooter in its moment to moment gameplay. Crapcom did this to make it familiar to most gamers so that it's more accessible to a wider audience. Does that sound like a good thing to you? In a gaming era where 3rd person perspective games are a dime a dozen, this just comes off as unoriginal.Resident Evil 2 Remake is very different from Resident Evil 4 though. More emphasis on ressource management, open and intersecting level design, puzzles, key/code hunting, avoidance of enemies
It's not an obsession with tank controls. It's wanting the old camera perspective and style of play that many of us enjoyed back in the day. That was what Resident Evil was to a lot of us and we were hoping it would make a return with the new remakes but Crapcom sadly didn't want to take the risk of alienating RE4 & action game fans.I dont get the obsession with tank controls.